<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dork Shelf &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dorkshelf.com/category/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dorkshelf.com</link>
	<description>Comics, Film, Video Games, TV, Music, Toronto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-ca</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Girls Episode 1.6 Recap</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/22/girls-episode-1-6/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/22/girls-episode-1-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sasha James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allison Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Walken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessa Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker Poesy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zosa Mamet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=19014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a successful trip to New York, herself, Sasha James returns to give us a rundown of the 6th episode of HBO's <cite>Girls</cite>, this time with producer Judd Apatow at the helm, the action taking place in Michigan, and with a lot more Goo Goo Dolls. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/22/girls-episode-1-6/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/05/girls3-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18443" title="girls3-1" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/05/girls3-1.png" alt="" width="620" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><em>No new images available for this week. Sorry guys.</em></p>
<p>This is the episode we&#8217;ve been waiting for, everybody! &#8220;The Return&#8221;, episode six of<em> Girls</em>, marks executive producer Judd Apatow&#8217;s first appearance as co-writer on the show. After five episodes of Lena Dunham solely at the helm, it&#8217;s a bit of a relief to have someone else in the mix creatively; There were a few episodes there that were occasionally sluggish.</p>
<p>But that was then. Now, we&#8217;re in Michigan!</p>
<p>With a garbage bag of laundry in tow, Hannah visits her parents for their 30th anniversary. This return home gives Hannah the opportunity to see what her life could have been like if she hadn&#8217;t decided on becoming a writer and living in New York. And, as with any return of the prodigal son to la familia, Hannah eats all the leftovers in her parents&#8217; fridge (with her hands), sleeps in until lunch, and gives her mother permanent bitch-face.</p>
<p>While on an errand for her mother, Hannah meets Erik, the sweet, long-haired pharmacist, who is essentially the antithesis of Adam. (I can&#8217;t believe Adam, &#8220;the douche,&#8221; is still factoring in on this show. But, he is.) Erik remembers Hannah from high school distinctly, is interested in her, and horrified by Hannah&#8217;s frank behaviour in bed. Up until this episode, I thought Adam was abusing Hannah emotionally, and I guess he still is, but that&#8217;s clearly what she wants out of her relationships and sex.</p>
<p>Her (surprisingly not caustic) conversation with Adam &#8211;<em> &#8220;I don&#8217;t even care if you get my name wrong.&#8221;</em> &#8212; and his description of New York City from his apartment window have Hannah smiling by the end of the episode, showing that, even though they&#8217;re not easy, Adam and New York are Hannah&#8217;s. In the end, the alternate life presented to Hannah in &#8220;The Return&#8221;, that of a florist/teacher with a blonde, caring boyfriend and without rent to pay, won&#8217;t make Hannah <em>&#8220;the voice of her generation&#8221;</em> and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s most important to her.</p>
<p>Oh, and another thing:<br />
- Is Shosh still a virgin? Yes. Yes, she is. Well, who really knows? We&#8217;ve barely seen Shoshanna these last couple episodes. Bring back the Spwan of Mamet!<br />
- There&#8217;s a Parker Poesy <em>Party Girl</em> poster on Hannah&#8217;s wall and little else.<br />
- Plenty of Goo Goo Dolls love on tonight&#8217;s episode.<br />
- Hannah&#8217;s mother needs her prescription now &#8212; <em>now!</em> &#8212; but Hannah still manages to squeeze in a lunch and score a date.<br />
- <em>&#8220;You are from New York and, therefore, you&#8217;re just naturally interesting.&#8221;</em> I often forget why anyone could like Hannah, and then she delivers this pep talk to her reflection before a date.<br />
- I was just as cynical as Hannah during Blonde Friend With Beret&#8217;s little &#8220;derrière&#8221; dance at The Benefit For Kary Lawrence. That might pass in Michigan, but you&#8217;re leaving for L.A. in the morning, kid. Also, your boyfriend&#8217;s so gay.<br />
- I was unsure if Tad&#8217;s <em>Annie Hall</em> impersonation was supposed to be Woody Allen&#8230; or Christopher Walken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/22/girls-episode-1-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls Episode 1.4 Recap</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/07/girls-episode-1-4-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/07/girls-episode-1-4-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sasha James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allison Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessa Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiny Furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zosa Mamet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=18442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a week away, Sasha James returns to give us our weekly re-cap of HBO's <cite>Girls</cite>, the show that took four episodes to get around to mentioning brunch. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/07/girls-episode-1-4-recap/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/05/girls3-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18443" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/05/girls3-1.png" alt="" width="620" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Another week, another episode of Lena Dunham&#8217;s <em>Girls</em> to love/hate.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what happened to the girls of HBO &#8211;</p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t a title sequence again. So, I should probably stop looking forward to an intricately designed collage of ripped pantyhose, cupcakes and (doubly ironic) PBR cans.</p>
<p>Hannah has the lion&#8217;s share of problems this week, as always. She&#8217;s sent a sext by her &#8220;boyfriend&#8221; that was meant for someone else, her boss is feeling her up, and her diary is found by unfriendly snoops. Initially, I found a lot in Hannah&#8217;s character that I found relatable, but after the premiere of <em>Girls</em>, her inability to remove herself from unhealthy situations is dragging Dunham&#8217;s protagonist into the mud. Her work situation is begging for a sexual harassment case to be opened. Her diary should be hidden a little better. And, please, let&#8217;s not even speak about Adam, Hannah&#8217;s douchebag sex friend. Okay, well, I kind of have to; He texts a picture of his penis to Hannah, starting off the episode, and, of course, it&#8217;s by accident. That sext was meant for another girl. Instead of listening to Marnie and her co-workers &#8212; Dump him! &#8212; Dunham rips off her shirt and Hannah sends Adam a naked picture of herself. She almost redeems herself, however, when Hannah shouts at Adam eloquently and succinctly about her dissatisfaction with both their behaviour. I was cheering her on &#8212; Dump him! Dump him! But then she doesn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s like Dunham really, really doesn&#8217;t want me to care about Hannah. Because, right now, I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Even though I was pretty sure Marnie&#8217;s newly-shaven &#8220;American History X&#8221; boyfriend Charlie was a goner in episode two, he&#8217;s still kicking around, isn&#8217;t he? Yep, there he is in Marnie and Hannah&#8217;s apartment writing a song about Keds while doing carpentry! Keds. Carpentry. While writing a song for their two-man indie band. Ugh. To make things even worse, Alex Karpovsky appears as Charlie&#8217;s friend Ray; If you remember, he played the YouTube wunderkind in Dunham&#8217;s film <em>Tiny Furniture</em>. When I first recognized who he was, I assumed that, like in <em>Tiny Furniture</em>, Karpovsky will be playing a scumbag in <em>Girls</em>. He doesn&#8217;t disappoint. If Charlie is still Marnie&#8217;s boyfriend in the next episode of <em>Girls</em>, then it&#8217;s not only Hannah that makes godawful life decisions.</p>
<p>Jessa&#8217;s still at her babysitting gig despite her dumbfounded awe that, yes, you do have to show up every day to work even if you don&#8217;t feel like it. I was initially proud of her for committing to something, but then Jessa&#8217;s &#8220;I&#8217;m just like all of you&#8221; comment to the other caregivers was steeped in deeply pretentious delusion. Despite this and surprising everyone, however, Jessa&#8217;s quickly turning into the most emotionally accessible of the main characters on <em>Girls</em>. In an honest moment to the father of the kids she&#8217;s watching, Jessa admits that when she was a child she used to lie often, telling people that her mother was &#8220;this awesome mom&#8221; and that they were the best of friends. It&#8217;s a sad moment and a short one, but it&#8217;s a key into a character that&#8217;s otherwise drawn in wispy, oblique lines.</p>
<p>Now for that weekly question: Is Shoshanna still a virgin? Yes, she is, though a camp counsellor of hers came quite close to doing the deed. I&#8217;m slightly surprised that Shoshanna gave permission to a man in sandals and a knee brace to enter her apartment let alone allow him to hypothetically take her virginity.</p>
<p>Oh, and another thing:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;It&#8217;s probably his asshole wearing a friendship bracelet!&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;These are holes.&#8221; They&#8217;re not crotchless panties.</li>
<li>Hannah&#8217;s eyebrows are so distracting after her co-workers &#8220;fix&#8221; them.</li>
<li>&#8220;I so don&#8217;t get attached when I bleed.&#8221; Shoshanna has the best line delivery, and the best lines, to be honest.</li>
<li>Brunch reference; It took four episodes.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/05/07/girls-episode-1-4-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls Episode 1.2 Review</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/04/23/girls-episode-1-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/04/23/girls-episode-1-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sasha James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allison Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessa Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kicking and Screaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noah Baumbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiny Furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zosa Mamet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=17733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sasha James returns for a recap of the second episode of HBO's <cite>Girls</cite>, the show that no matter if you love it or hate it, looks like it's staying around for a while. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2012/04/23/girls-episode-1-2-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/04/girls2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17734" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2012/04/girls2.png" alt="" width="620" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>So, you may have heard of this little thing on HBO called <em>Girls</em>. It&#8217;s directed, written, and stars Lena Dunham, who previously made the film <em>Tiny Furniture</em> (that just happens to be in the Criterion Collection despite its 2010 release date.) You couldn&#8217;t have avoided the post-premiere frenzy of the last week. &#8220;It&#8217;s racist/elitist/the result of nepotism!&#8221; screamed the Internet. Everyone&#8217;s got an opinion on <em>Girls</em>; It doesn&#8217;t really matter if they watch the show. It&#8217;s the best/worst show on television; the second coming and the seventh seal of the apocalypse. Like it or not, though, this Judd Apatow produced comedy has a full run on the HBO locked down.</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s put together the pieces of what happened this week on <em>Girls</em>, whether you enjoyed it, were indifferent or indulged in some hate-watching.</p>
<p><em>Girls</em>&#8216; second episode began with a cold open to Hannah and Adam (also known as Douchebag) engaged in some HBO rated sex. It&#8217;s excruciating to watch, and that&#8217;s exactly what Dunham wants. Unfortunately, her relationship with Adam is about 50% of everything we know about Hannah up to this point, and I&#8217;m really quite tiring of her willingness to put up with him &#8212; and it&#8217;s only the second episode. It doesn&#8217;t help that Adam gives her an STD. After leaving Adam to his apparently condomless (and tactless) existence, Hannah&#8217;s got a job interview! Yes! But she bombs! No! Her interview is an excellent run of dialogue, and her rape joke is unexpected, completely in-character, and Dunham&#8217;s attempt to save the conversation and make the joke seem flippant was palpable with regret.</p>
<p>The A-story of the night was Jessa&#8217;s abortion, with Marnie organizing a pseudo get-together at the abortion clinic for support/STD testing. Where Marnie and Hannah (though less successful in all endeavours) confront their problems head on, Jessa, chronically sleepy and aloof, has indulged in a life of international travel and pot. Commitment of any kind, even to make the decision between having an abortion or not, is difficult for Jessa. Her default reaction is inaction. It&#8217;s, therefore, not suprising to see Jessa skip the abortion party &#8212; it turned into a party when Shoshanna brought Dylan&#8217;s Candy Bar snacks &#8212; and down a few drinks with the crotchety old men Hannah praised during her unfortunate job interview. Then, of course, in walks some stranger who vaguely looks like Cillian Murphy in the shadows, and it&#8217;s a given sex will be had, and, oh, the pregnancy just solves itself. Apathy works sometimes, kids. This sentiment is later repeated with Hannah&#8217;s fear of AIDS, where she starts almost daydreaming about not having to pay her rent or keep a job; She could use AIDS as an excuse to get out of her commitments. This little deferment fantasy is probably the most telling portrayal of Hannah&#8217;s mindset thus far in <em>Girls</em>.</p>
<p>Marnie&#8217;s become bored with her relationship with Marnie&#8217;s Boyfriend. He has a name, but it doesn&#8217;t really matter.  All the audience needs to know is the Marnie&#8217;s developed a distate for her &#8220;too great&#8221; boyfriend of four years. It looks like he&#8217;s been dumped, but the scene lacked a finality for a relationship of that length. Maybe he&#8217;ll return, or maybe Marnie will move on quickly to a better storyline. She really is the least developed of the characters. I still don&#8217;t quite understand what Marnie does for a living; She does have a scene where she&#8217;s in an office (But was it an office?) and could have been working. She was blatantly taking a personal phone call and talking about the gynecologist though. So, let&#8217;s not jump to conclusions. She&#8217;s probably employed, is all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
<p>Shoshanna, as a character, is in a very precarious position on <em>Girls</em>. She&#8217;s representative of everything I personally believe Lena Dunham despises: the &#8220;Girl Power,&#8221; yoga class-attending, <em>Sex and the City</em>-watching, hand-me-down view of young female adulthood that&#8217;s still very much prevalent &#8212; the image Girls is attempting to subvert. Shoshanna has grown up with these expectations and idolizes this culture of stilettos, bestfriendship, and sexual freedom &#8212; &#8220;I heard you were getting an STD test. Fun.&#8221; &#8212; but she doesn&#8217;t participate. Not really. Shoshanna&#8217;s a reluctant, twenty-year-old female virgin on an HBO series, and isn&#8217;t that surprisingly refreshing?</p>
<p>Oh, and another thing:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;So good. I almost came.&#8221;</li>
<li>I thought there&#8217;d be a title sequence this week, but there was nothing. I really hope this was just because of time constraints on this particular episode. If I had an HBO show and didn&#8217;t get one of their elaborately beautiful titles sequences, I&#8217;d be angry.</li>
<li>&#8220;I could not be more proud of you for getting this abortion.&#8221; I predict that Jessa and Shoshanna will probably be my favourite characters.</li>
<li>&#8220;Have you seen your nuts? Ew.&#8221; And then wait for it &#8212; &#8220;Ew.&#8221; The delivery of that last &#8220;Ew&#8221; was perfect.</li>
<li>I kind of want all of Hannah&#8217;s clothes in this episode.</li>
<li>&#8220;I am not a character from one of your novels. Stop staring at my face so hard.&#8221; At least Hannah&#8217;s not scribbling in a notebook like in <em>Kicking &amp; Screaming</em>. I might need to reference Noah Baumbach in every <em>Girls</em> recap.</li>
<li>The underwear stains thing.</li>
<li>I really did think that guy that called his mother with Jessa&#8217;s &#8220;cellular phone&#8221; was Cillian Murphy. I honestly did. But it was just a hipster.</li>
<li>Marnie&#8217;s response to Shoshanna&#8217;s virginity is that she hit a dog with her car and only has a learner&#8217;s permit.</li>
<li>&#8220;It&#8217;s more of a Forrest Gump based fear.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2012/04/23/girls-episode-1-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boardwalk Empire Episode 2.1 Review</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/09/26/boardwalk-empire-episode-2-1-review/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/09/26/boardwalk-empire-episode-2-1-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Drance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boardwalk Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dabney Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Huston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael K Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shea Whigham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Buscemi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=14523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boardwalk Empire – the star-studded prohibition era drama from HBO - returned to our television screens with a bang this past weekend. The show seems to have found its footing right out of the gate, and is at its well-acted, violent, multi-faceted best in this season's opening episode – titled “21” for the year portrayed (1921). <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/09/26/boardwalk-empire-episode-2-1-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/09/Michael-Pitt-in-Boardwalk-Empire-HBO-600.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-14530" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/09/Michael-Pitt-in-Boardwalk-Empire-HBO-600.jpg" alt="Michael Pitt (left) and Steve Buscemi in Boardwalk Empire" width="600" height="399" /></a></em><em></em></p>
<p><em>Boardwalk Empire</em> – the star-studded prohibition era drama from HBO &#8211; returned to our television screens with a bang this past weekend. The show seems to have found its footing right out of the gate, and is at its well-acted, violent, multi-faceted best in this season&#8217;s opening episode – titled “21” for the year portrayed (1921).</p>
<p>When last season closed, Nucky Thompson (Steve Buscemi) had just won the re-election for his party and superficially seemed to have consolidated his hold on booze distribution and political power in Atlantic City. However, a re-invigorated former boss – the Commodore (Dabney Coleman) – had enlisted Nucky&#8217;s brother Eli (Shea Whigham) and his protege Jimmy (Michael Pitt) in a conspiracy to overthrow Nucky. In this season&#8217;s first episode, the Commodore and his cronies make their first moves to attack Nucky&#8217;s lucrative position of power.</p>
<p>The show opens with a visually appealing montage, set to some of those gorgeous, brassy 1920s tunes that the series utilized liberally throughout its first 13 episodes. We catch up with half-faced Richard Harrow (Jack Huston) and Jimmy – who have clearly professionalized their bootlegging operations – importing a large amount of booze at Nucky&#8217;s behest for sale to Chalky White (Michael K Williams). Nucky imbibes spirits with his Ward Bosses as they gamble and enjoy the company of show-girls. Van Alden (Michael Shannon) picks up his wife at the train station, Eli is shown to be healing from the gunshot wound he suffered late last season and Margaret (Kelly McDonald) looks wistfully at Nucky&#8217;s empty space in their marital bed. The Commodore – in contrast to Nucky&#8217;s carefree gallivanting – is practising his spear-work in his extravagant den. It&#8217;s a weird shot, but the Commodore is a weird dude – and it serves to convey the old man&#8217;s focus and aggression. The montage serves to situate and misdirect the audience into an apparent calm before the storm &#8211; before the episode hits us with an outburst of blood and gun play.</p>
<p>Shortly after Jimmy&#8217;s delivery to Chalky White, the warehouse where Chalky waters the liqour down is shot up by a group of four Klansmen armed with shotguns and a mounted chain gun. They slaughter five occupants of the warehouse (and one woman, who saves Chalky&#8217;s life) in the name of “Purity, Sobriety and the White Christian&#8217;s Jesus.” Michael K Williams, <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/09/22/boardwalk-empire-interview-michael-k-williams/">who we interviewed about the show this week</a>, has a tremendous acting moment &#8211; his traumatized facial expression, and the stylized manner in which the camera zooms in on it is haunting.</p>
<p>The community&#8217;s reaction to the shooting is telling – it&#8217;s a big deal that Chalky shot a white man, but the five black warehouse workers who died barely register. Nucky, of course, is indifferent to racial politics and plays both sides; speaking of the evils of the Klan in a black church, before condemning the “obstreperous negro” to white parishioners in a different church. Politics was a good deal easier before YouTube, I can tell you. The shot that seamlessly transitions from one church to the other is clever, and underscores Nucky&#8217;s overwhelming political apathy. In any event, the trauma and Nucky&#8217;s apathetic reaction to it causes Chalky to close up shop – which is exactly what the Commodore (who unleashed the KKK on Chalky&#8217;s men) was hoping to achieve.</p>
<p>Nucky&#8217;s awareness of the growing plot against him becomes complete at the funeral of the shot Klansmen when Jimmy shows up. Though Jimmy claims to be there because the deceased klansmen is “a former teacher,” Nucky is wise to what&#8217;s happening. He feebly warns Jimmy of the Commodore&#8217;s duplicity, and a glance inside at a town elder confirms his suspicions. As the episode concludes Nucky is arrested for election fraud, and – though it&#8217;s not clear yet – we can safely assume that the Commodore has had a hand in bringing these charges against his rival.</p>
<p>Though the Commodore&#8217;s first moves against Nucky drive the plot forward in the season opener, the driving thematic force is the interplay between fathers and their sons. We&#8217;ve got Teddy, Margaret&#8217;s son – who is misbehaving at school, and playing with matches – in need of fatherly guidance. Jimmy – whose kids, he tells Nucky, are “nearly old enough to shave” – takes his son seagull hunting, something he used to do with Nucky. In contrast to the hunting Jimmy did with Nuck (his adoptive father figure), his natural father the Commodore clearly never had time to take Jimmy shooting &#8211; though he brags of his exploits to Jimmy while showing off his own, impressive collection of trophies.</p>
<p>In the episode&#8217;s final scene, Jimmy stores Nucky&#8217;s wedding gift, a statue of a man and his boy, hunting in the woods, in a place of dishonour while Margaret and her children watch Charlie Chaplin&#8217;s <em>The Kid</em> at a theatre. <em>The Kid</em> was Chaplin&#8217;s 1921 full-length comedy feature about a tramp who adopts a boy from a poor woman, who soon becomes a famous actress. In the film, Chaplin&#8217;s tramp mentors the child in petty crime, and comes to love the boy, before losing the child at the end of the film. Van Patten &#8211; of course &#8211; makes sure to select the most domestic of the silent film&#8217;s scenes to accompany the action in the theatre. Taken together, the two images convey a father&#8217;s estrangement from his son &#8211; which is the primary emotional conflict in the episode. Jimmy is choosing his natural parents, his mother who very weirdly admits to “kissing his winky” when she would change change his diapers &#8211; and his control freak father &#8211; and he&#8217;s chosen to betray the man who has loved and raised him.</p>
<p>In the episode&#8217;s main side-plot, Mrs. Van Alden has come to visit her twisted husband Nelson, who, for my money, remains the show&#8217;s most engaging character. Nelson is increasingly in a dark space &#8211; he has given into the temptation of Atlantic City or “Soddom by the sea.” His new G-men, Clarkson and Zewicki, gift his wife a seemingly religious pamphlet “If Jesus Ever Came to Atlantic City” that turns out to be a list of brothels and taverns. “It&#8217;s the author&#8217;s attempt at cynicism,” Nelson assures his wife, though the pamphlet is just another metaphor for the personal corruption eating at Van Alden.</p>
<p>The raid scene in the restaurant is great fun, as Nelson takes some time out from his engagement dinner to beat up the waiter and raid the establishment. Nelson doesn&#8217;t seem to have any plans to raid the joint until his wife urges him to do so, and afterwards he notices a bar-back carrying a crate filled with contraband. When he does raid the place, it serves two selfish purposes for Van Alden – it inflames his wife, and allows him to procure the restaurant&#8217;s <em>cash in hand</em> to pay-off Lucy who is carrying his child.</p>
<p>The directors clearly love to poke fun at Van Alden and the shot where they transition from Van Alden&#8217;s wife, clearly turned on by Van Alden&#8217;s lawman outburst, to the bouncing springs at the Hotel Metropole, is a clever stylistic flourish. When Van Alden then turns out the lights before engaging in some godly, marital sex? Well ,that&#8217;s the cherry on top.</p>
<p>The season opener has set the table for what I&#8217;m expecting to be a significantly stronger season than <em>Boardwalk Empire</em>&#8216;s first go-around. While <em>Boardwalk</em> suffered from some growing pains through its first five or six episodes, it picked up steam in the latter half of last season, and that seems to be carrying through. Nucky is in a precarious bind now: he&#8217;s lost his warehouse, and a giant shipment of booze; he must contend with betrayals from a brother, and a son; and he&#8217;s got a significant legal problem on his hands. Clearly the stage is set for a serious Hardeen escape artist act, an act that we can expect to include a significant dose of violence, nudity and all that good stuff we love from HBO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/09/26/boardwalk-empire-episode-2-1-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who Episode 6.2 Review</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/07/doctor-who-episode-6-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/07/doctor-who-episode-6-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sasha James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Darvill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Day of the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Gillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sheppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Impossible Astronaut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I said in my review, the first episode of <cite>Doctor Who</cite> Series Six —"The Impossible Astronaut" — was filled with elaborate narrative arcs and characters on the brink of disaster. The second part to this two-parter serial — "Day of the Moon" — does nothing in the way of answering questions or alleviating any of the tension introduced in the previous episode. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/07/doctor-who-episode-6-2-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Episode 6.2 &#8211; &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221;</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Doctor-Who-Day-of-the-Moon.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12736" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Doctor-Who-Day-of-the-Moon.jpg" alt="Doctor Who - 6.2 - Day of the Moon" width="600" height="305" /></a></strong><em> </em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><em>Spoilers for the entirety of Series Five as well as &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221; (6.1), &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221; (6.2).</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left">As I said in <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/21/doctor-who-episode-6-1-review/">my review</a>, the first episode of <em>Doctor Who</em>&#8216;s Series Six —&#8221;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221; — was filled with elaborate narrative arcs and characters on the brink of disaster. The second part to this two-parter serial — &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221; — does nothing in the way of answering questions or alleviating any of the tension introduced in the previous episode.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">We last left The Doctor (Matt Smith) and his companion Amy Pond (Karen Gillan) in an abandoned warehouse in 1960s Florida. Much to The Doctor&#8217;s respective shock and horror, Amy revealed that she was pregnant right before shooting a child encased in an astronaut&#8217;s suit. While this happened, it was suggested that Amy&#8217;s husband Rory (Arthur Darvill) and the mysterious River Song (Alex Kingston) may be killed by the even more mysterious &#8220;Big Bad&#8221; of this series, the Silents. This cliffhanger was expertly established by the deft pen of writer Steven Moffat. The resolution of this cliffhanger, however, left much to be desired. &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221;, though head and shoulders above most <em>Doctor Who</em> episodes, suffers greatly from rehashing of story-lines (read: Rory), terrible pacing and a complete lack of logic.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">The Doctor set out on a rescue mission in &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221;, an attempt to find the scared child who haunts President Nixon &#8211; but also discover what she meant by the astronaut who is coming to eat her. So, why would The Doctor run away from this scared little girl, entrapped in an space suit seconds after Amy attempted to shoot her? This is a man who would move worlds for a crying child, yet in &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221; he just runs away? This kind of inconsistency runs rampant throughout &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221; &#8212; to the point where I had to double-check whether or not Moffat was this episode&#8217;s writer. This is uncharacteristic for him, to say the least. Some of the other major inconsistencies and logistical errors include:</p>
<ul>
<li>How did Rory and River get away from The Silents?</li>
<li>Why are the FBI faking their chase of The Doctor, Amy, Rory and River?</li>
<li>Nixon could have just provided the &#8220;safe space&#8221; prison immediately. Why didn&#8217;t he?</li>
<li>How did the TARDIS get in the prison without The Doctor or River?</li>
<li>Why does Canton (Mark Sheppard) need to &#8220;kill&#8221; the TARDIS Team? Couldn&#8217;t The Doctor just use the TARDIS to get his friends, as he was untied?</li>
<li>How did Amy and Rory pretend they were dead &#8212; to the FBI &#8212; without being physically injured?</li>
<li>Canton travelled a lot to &#8220;kill&#8221; the companions. How did Amy and Rory survive for that long in those body bags?</li>
<li>What the hell is going on?</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left">There are more — believe me, there are more — and these examples are only from the first ten minutes of the episode. These inconsistencies aside, the episode was visually-gorgeous, boasted strong performances from its leads, and provided enough narrative fodder for at least the rest of this series, if not another. Questions included: Who are the Silents? Is Amy pregnant? Who was the one-eyed woman? Who is River Song? The big one: Who is the little girl in this episode&#8217;s final moments? Again, there are more questions, believe me.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Moffat, thankfully, gives us a little sneak into that first question and allows those suit-wearing, <em>Buffy</em>-esque monsters to reveal that, yes, they are the Silents. With the TARDIS Team assembled, Canton is provided with the background for the Silents. It&#8217;s been three months since the events of &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221; (and six from &#8220;A Christmas Carol&#8221; (5.X), if you&#8217;re counting in relation to the possible pregnancy, like me). The Doctor and his companions have arranged a bit of technology that will help them remember the Silents.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Unfortunately, however, this raises more questions. How does the TARDIS Team even remember that they have forgotten the Silents? Personally, I&#8217;m guessing this is because Amelia is an anomaly in regard to time/space and especially memory, given that she lived with the Crack in her wall whilst growing up. That, partnered with the image on her phone of the Silent, lead to her explaining it to the others, etc. However, in the TARDIS, it is revealed that an image of a Silent becomes itself a Silent, where Canton cannot remember seeing the projection once he&#8217;s looked away. This is very much in the same vein as the Weeping Angels. The Silents, in fact, are bleeding into Weeping Angel territory throughout &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221;. It&#8217;s as if you&#8217;re safe from the Silents as long as you&#8217;re looking at them &#8211; much like the Angels. This trope is used heavily in the final confrontation of this episode and it is only at the last second that the Silents seemingly remember they can disintegrate anything they want with a wave of their hand. In &#8220;The Impossible Astronaut&#8221;, I was completely terrified of the Silents. In &#8220;Day of the Moon&#8221;? Not so much. If they killed a couple red shirts and maybe harmed a companion or two, I&#8217;m sure this opinion would have been drastically altered.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Whovians out there are starting to ask, &#8220;Has <em>Doctor Who</em> become too complicated?&#8221; I&#8217;ve waxed on about inconsistencies and questions but, right at its heart, <em>Doctor Who</em> is a <em>children&#8217;s programme</em>. (Apparently.) In the post-<em>Lost</em> television landscape, complicated, mystery-heavy narratives are simultaneously revered and rejected by the same community. In Series Five, Moffat was able to maintain this franchise&#8217;s family-friendly &#8220;roller-coaster ride&#8221; themes all while casting aside the sentimentality and fan-servicing notorious under the helm of Russell T. Davies. Moffat managed to do this while adding his own spin: empowered female companions, terrifying monsters and complicated, rewarding narrative arcs. But has Moffat gone too far? Is <em>Doctor Who</em> too complicated as of Series Six?</p>
<p style="text-align: left">If you&#8217;re asking for my opinion, well, I watched <em>Lost</em> religiously. I don&#8217;t mind a bit of complication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/07/doctor-who-episode-6-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game of Thrones Episode 1.3 Review</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/01/game-of-thrones-episode-1-3-review/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/01/game-of-thrones-episode-1-3-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Drance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aiden Gillen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emilia Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George R. R. Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit Harington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Headey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Addy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikolaj Coster-Waldau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arrivals, false glory and palace intrigue are the primary concerns of the third instalment of HBO's <cite>Game of Thrones</cite>. The episode is entitled “Lord Snow”, though Jon Snow plays a relatively minor role in the episode as a whole, and is not technically a nobleman. Following the Stark family's arduous journey from Winterfell, the episode begins with Ned's uncomfortable arrival in King's Landing, where he assumes the title of Hand of the King. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/01/game-of-thrones-episode-1-3-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Game-of-Thrones-Jon-Snow.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12611" title="Game of Thrones - Jon Snow (Kit Harington)" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Game-of-Thrones-Jon-Snow.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - Jon Snow (Kit Harington)" width="600" height="324" /></a></p>
<p>Arrivals, false glory and palace intrigue are the primary concerns of the third instalment of HBO&#8217;s <em>Game of Thrones</em>. The episode is entitled  “<em>Lord Snow</em>”, though Jon Snow plays a relatively minor role in the episode as a whole, and is not technically a nobleman (more on this later).  Following the Stark family&#8217;s <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/24/game-of-thrones-episode-1-2-review/">arduous journey</a> from Winterfell, the episode begins with Ned&#8217;s uncomfortable arrival in King&#8217;s Landing, where he assumes the title of Hand of the King. We learn quickly that Ned has little time for the trivialities of the tropical capital, and his refusal to change into more appropriate garb for his first meeting with the King&#8217;s small council may tell us all we need to know about Ned&#8217;s suitability for the position he has just assumed.</p>
<p>On his way to the meeting, Ned has a tense conversation with Jaime Lannister about the death of Ned&#8217;s father and brother, and their talk shines more light on Jaime&#8217;s role in the murder of the “Mad King”, Aerys Targaryen. Though the show will be criticized by some for its reliance on exposition, we have, so far, found exchanges like the one between Jaime and Ned to be rather riveting. Ned&#8217;s implication that Jaime&#8217;s act of regicide was actually rather cowardly is very striking, and the public execution of Ned&#8217;s kin remains a point of curiosity (we can only hope for a gruesome flashback in a subsequent episode).</p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Game-of-Thrones-Jaime-Lannister.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12609" title="Game of Thrones - Jaime Lannister (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau)" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/Game-of-Thrones-Jaime-Lannister.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - Jaime Lannister (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau)" width="600" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>If you thought dual conspiracies threatening the king (one from the incestuous Lannister twins, and the other the result of the Targaryen union with the Dothraki horde) were concerning – add to it the fact that the Kingdom is in crippling debt, and the soldiers on the Wall are totally unprepared for the coming winter. The  “broken cultural and political system” narrative adds urgency to the real politiking in the capital, and makes it so that Aiden Gillen&#8217;s appearance as Littlefinger in the series isn&#8217;t the only thing that will remind viewers of <em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<p>Reality is of little consequence, it seems, in King&#8217;s Landing – and elsewhere in Westeros for that matter. The gulf between the reality of kings of Westeros, and the glory bestowed upon them, is explored at length in two of the episode&#8217;s more curious scenes. This gap is introduced by Cersei&#8217;s revealing conversation with Prince Joffrey. She assuages his doubts about his own lack of character by assuring him that a King creates his own heroic reality, regardless of the veracity of that version. In a later conversation between the King, Barristan the Bold and the Kingslayer, the King Robert is flat-out interrogating Jaime about his first kill. Considering what we know about how Lannisters view their own relationship with reality; the King, and the audience, are quite right to be dubious of the heroic account given by Jaime. The King&#8217;s wonderful exclamation that the losers of a heroic battle often shit themselves but it “never makes it into the songs,” is a clear and rather humorous illustration of the “reality deficit” rampant in the seven kingdoms.</p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/game-of-thrones-tyrion.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12607" title="Game of Thrones - Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage)" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/05/game-of-thrones-tyrion.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage)" width="600" height="324" /></a></p>
<p>Which brings us back to Jon Snow – who has arrived and begun his training among the Night&#8217;s Watch. It was hinted at by the Imp in episode two – but in this episode we get a proper glimpse at the reality of the situation among the Night&#8217;s Watch. They are outcasts and criminals, abandoned men left to rot in the lonely cold of the Wall, “everyone knew what this place was” Jon Snow tells Tyrion, “but nobody told me.” Perhaps this is why the episode bears the noble version of Jon Snow&#8217;s name, he is the main victim of this gulf between reality and glory in Westeros.</p>
<p>Tidbits:</p>
<ul>
<li>The scenes with the Imp and Jon 		Snow at the Wall; the manner in which the Imp teaches Jon about how 		to lead his unsavoury compatriots; and the desperate pleas of the 		Night&#8217;s Watch elders to the Imp were well executed. The sense of 		foreboding and pending doom that pervades the show is most intense 		at the Wall – especially because the viewer knows for sure , what 		no characters will openly speculate about: the White Walker&#8217;s have 		indeed returned.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> The acting in this series 		continues to be strong, and the dialogue flows very well for an 		exposition heavy show in only its third episode. A comparison of <em> Game of Thrones</em> with the initial start of <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> (a show 		that took about half a season to get comfortable with itself) is 		very flattering to the <em>Thrones</em> writing staff. From a pure enjoyment 		standpoint: the scenes of Arya&#8217;s “dance-lessons” with Syrio 		were great fun, and I rewatched the cryptic monologue from Bram&#8217;s 		care-taker about “the boy who doesn&#8217;t like stories” and the 		“generation long winter” with glee.</li>
<li>Aiden Gillen, ladies and 		gentleman. Is there a better actor to portray a rat-fink in all of 		television? I can&#8217;t think of any. When it comes to playing smarmy punchable sycophants, Gillen is, as Tina Turner might say, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIrCFrFpHvw">simply the best.</a></li>
<li>The power-shift between Dany and 		Viserys was awesome for anyone who likes to see pompous, whiny, long-haired blonde dudes get pushed around (i.e. everyone). Dany&#8217;s 		pregnancy is – of course – a game-changer, as the look on Jorah 		Mormont&#8217;s face when he hears the news makes plain. Emilia Clarke 		has been excellent, and Dany&#8217;s character development has been a 		highlight so far. Her shared kiss with Drogo as she predicts that 		her spawn will be male, seemed like a genuinely happy moment between 		the couple – even if it&#8217;s clear that Drogo is mostly a means to 		an end for Dany.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/05/01/game-of-thrones-episode-1-3-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who Episode 6.1 Review</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/21/doctor-who-episode-6-1-review/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/21/doctor-who-episode-6-1-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sasha James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Darvill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tennant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Gillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sheppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell T. Davies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Moffat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Haynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the previous series, Steven Moffat hit the ground running, creating one of the most entertaining collections of episodes in <cite>Doctor Who</cite> history. With the eleventh incarnation of The Doctor garnering an impressive amount of critical praise and fan approval, its understandable that Moffat's sophomore effort is one of the most highly-anticipated television shows of the year. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/21/doctor-who-episode-6-1-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Episode 6.1 &#8211; “The Impossible Astronaut”</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12428" title="Doctor Who - Matt Smith" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro1.jpg" alt="Doctor Who - Matt Smith" width="600" height="286" /></a></p>
<p>Series Four’s “The End of Time” (4.17) marked the departure of show-runner Russell T. Davies and actor David Tennant from the revived version of BBC&#8217;s science fiction classic <em>Doctor Who</em>. Together, these two men have been accredited with bringing The Doctor and his adventures in space and time back into the everyday lives of British schoolchildren. For most, “The End of Time” was appropriately named, as many swore off <em>Doctor Who</em> with the departure of Davies and Tennant.</p>
<p>But for Steven Moffat, this was just the beginning. Writer of fan-favourite episodes such as “The Empty Child” (1.9), “The Girl in the Fireplace” (2.4), “Blink” (3.10) and “Silence in the Library” (4.9), Moffat’s inventive story-lines, original characters and terrifying monsters shattered all expectations of a <em>Doctor Who</em> script, gaining him an incredible following. On paper, Moffat was the right and proper choice as the successor to show-runner Russell T. Davies, and 2010 was the year when he proved it to all the naysayers.</p>
<p>With the eleventh incarnation of The Doctor (Matt Smith) and companion Amy Pond (Karen Gillan), Steven Moffat hit the ground running, creating one of the most entertaining collections of episodes in <em>Doctor Who</em> history. With an impressive amount of critical praise and fan approval, its understandable that his sophomore effort is one of the most highly-anticipated television shows of the year.</p>
<p>This year’s sixth series of <em>Doctor Who</em> starts with the episode “The Impossible Astronaut” (6.1), the first of a two-part story written by Steven Moffat. Here The Doctor is reunited with his recently-married companions Amy and Rory (Arthur Darvill) — months after their honeymoon — as well as the enigmatic archaeologist River Song (Alex Kingston). They are brought together via numbered letters that request their presence in 1960s America, a mysterious summons that The Doctor is unsure about, to put it lightly.</p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12429" title="Doctor Who - Karen Gillan" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro2.jpg" alt="Doctor Who - Karen Gillan" width="600" height="286" /></a></p>
<p>Over the course of this episode’s forty-five minutes, Moffat does what he does best; There are terrifying monsters, well-developed companions and enough timey-wimey-wibbly-wobbly stuff to rival some of the greatest <em>Doctor Who</em> out there. The first ten minutes of “The Impossible Astronaut” didn’t feel like a premiere at all but, rather, a finale. I was crying about a minute after the opening credits. Let’s just say something “very not good” happens to one member of the TARDIS team, and the others react appropriately. I would elaborate on this moment, as it will surely effect the entirety of series six, but in the words of River Song: “Spoilers!”</p>
<p>Throughout the episode, I was struck by how much Matt Smith and Karen Gillan have grown into their roles as The Doctor and Amy, respectively. Despite being the youngest actor to play The Doctor, Smith is able to exude an oldness that is unrivaled by his predecessors. His Doctor occasionally displays the childlike curiosity and playfulness that endeared him to his audience in the previous series &#8212; but The Doctor within “The Impossible Astronaut” is largely wary and accusing. It feels as if something happened to The Doctor in his absence from Amelia’s life. Within this absence, the one thing that I have been dreading about the future of Amy Pond comes into fruition. Despite this slight disappointment, I was pleased to see Gillan’s portrayal of The Doctor’s feisty partner-in-crime has been largely perfected. Is it just me or is the duo of Eleven and Amy up there with Four and Sarah Jane in regard to chemistry and storytelling?</p>
<p>Amy isn’t the only companion to The Doctor in this series, as Rory Williams (or Pond) and River Song take more permanent positions on the TARDIS team. There is a unexpected moment between River and Rory, as they discuss River’s placement in The Doctor’s time-stream. Here River discusses the complications of living out of sync with The Doctor. Rory and the audience don’t learn anything new about River, but they are provided with an emotional context to Dr. River Song &#8212; and this pushes the ending of “The Forest of the Dead” (4.10) into an even more tragic, heartbreaking light.</p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12430" title="Doctor Who - Alex Kingston" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/dwastro3.jpg" alt="Doctor Who - Alex Kingston" width="600" height="286" /></a></p>
<p>Even though River is speaking only of herself in this scene, her conversation with Rory illuminates the nuances of the relationships between those in the TARDIS, even those we thought were cemented out previously in “Amy’s Choice” (5.7). There has never been a married couple within the TARDIS before Mr. and Mrs. Pond. This scene alone suggests that there may be a reason why married companions have previously left The Doctor after they’ve become engaged to another man. The addition of Rory as a permanent companion — the first male companion in decades — is a wise choice on the part of Steven Moffat, as he provides a large amount of the laughs in this episode. His pseudo-internship on the TARDIS is amusing to behold. Remember Rory’s reaction when he entered the TARDIS for the first time? You should keep that in mind when Canton (guest star Mark Sheppard) says, “It’s bigger on the inside.”</p>
<p>The “Big Bad” of the opening two-parter — and it is rumored that they’re the central antagonists of the entire series — are unnamed within the first episode itself, but it is well-known to any Doctor Who nerd worth their salt that these monsters are called The Silence. They’re one part The Gentlemen from <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em>’s “Hush” (4.10), one part Dementors from <em>Harry Potter</em>, and edging up on the Weeping Angels in terms of the sheer terror that they provoke. Every time The Silence show up on screen, the hairs on the back of your neck will be standing at attention.</p>
<p>This episode is very much reminiscent of “The Time of Angels” (5.4) and “The Pandorica Opens” (5.12) in that it is epic in scale with elaborate narrative arcs and characters on the brink of disaster — all while maintaining a decidedly &#8216;Part One&#8217; feel. Steven Moffat told director Toby Haynes to film this premiere episode as if it were the first part of a finale — and this comes across like gangbusters. The TARDIS team is brought together only to be separated and placed on the chessboard that is <em>Doctor Who</em>’s sixth series. To say that I am intrigued as to where Steven Moffat moves his chess pieces is an understatement. And I’m sure you will agree with me wholeheartedly when Amy Pond picks up a gun in the  last moment of “The Impossible Astronaut” — and pulls the trigger.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Because this overview of “The Impossible Astronaut” was mostly spoiler-free, I thought I’d share a little hints as to what’s to come in the first episode:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ten Teasers For <em>Doctor Who</em>’s “The Impossible Astronaut”:<br />
</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Amy is keeping two secrets from The Doctor.</li>
<li>The Doctor tries to pull a “Blink” with Rory’s DVDs.</li>
<li>For Mr. and Mrs. Pond, it&#8217;s been a while since “A Christmas Carol”.</li>
<li>For The Doctor, it’s been much, much longer.</li>
<li>“River, make her blue again!&#8221;</li>
<li>The Doctor attempts white wine, despite hating red wine in “The Lodger”.</li>
<li>The Doctor and I share a theory about “special straws”.</li>
<li>Remember that moment when The Doctor pokes Rory in “The Big Bang”?</li>
<li>“The legs, the nose and Mrs. Robinson.”</li>
<li><em>Star Trek: The Original Series</em> ended in 1969. You should keep that in mind.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>“The Impossible Astronaut” and the sixth series of <em>Doctor Who</em> is coming to SPACE in Canada on April 23rd, 2011, at 8 p.m. It will be preceded by the <em>Doctor Who</em> specials, starring the tenth incarnation of The Doctor (David Tennant) and the entirety of Steven Moffat’s fifth series.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/21/doctor-who-episode-6-1-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game of Thrones Renewed for Second Season</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/19/hbo-renews-game-of-thrones-for-second-season/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/19/hbo-renews-game-of-thrones-for-second-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Drance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Song of Ice and Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emilia Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George R. R. Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Dinklage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this morning, HBO released ratings numbers for the premiere of their new epic fantasy series <cite>Game of Thrones</cite>, which we thoroughly enjoyed. Though the ratings were solid – if decidedly unspectacular – HBO also announced the show's renewal for a second season. Great news for fans new and old. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/19/hbo-renews-game-of-thrones-for-second-season/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Solid ratings and a season two renewal for HBO&#8217;s epic fantasy series <em>Game of Thrones</em>.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/Game-of-Thrones-Emilia-Clarke.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12403" title="Game of Thrones - Emilia Clarke" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/Game-of-Thrones-Emilia-Clarke.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - Emilia Clarke" width="600" height="338" /></a><br />
Earlier this morning, HBO released ratings numbers for the premiere of their new epic fantasy series <em>Game of Thrones</em>, which we <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/">thoroughly enjoyed</a>. Though the ratings were solid – if decidedly unspectacular – HBO also announced the show&#8217;s renewal for a second season. Great news for fans new and old.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/04/19/game-of-thrones-premiere-ratings/">James Hibberd of Entertainment Weekly</a> with a succinct summary of Sunday&#8217;s ratings:   “The first episode delivered a decent 2.2 million viewers for its premiere airing&#8230; then a rather strong 1.2 million for its first encore, and another 800,000 for the third telecast for an overall healthy total of 4.2 million.”</p>
<p>Those numbers are well behind the 5 million viewers who tuned in for the <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> premiere – but who are we kidding – no one seriously expected <em>Game of Thrones </em>to best the prohibition drama. <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> had several advantages over <em>Game of Thrones</em>: firstly, <em>Boardwalk</em>, as an organized crime drama, is a comparatively easy sell for HBO. <em>Boardwalk</em> also benefited from being advertised extensively during <em>True Blood</em> (another huge hit for the cable network) and also had a huge name – in Martin Scorsese – attached to the pilot as the director. In our humble opinion, Tim Van Patten is a stone-cold visual narrative bad-ass, but he doesn&#8217;t exactly generate the same pomp and circumstance as a legend like Scorsese.</p>
<p>As was smartly pointed out by <a href="http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2011/04/hbo-renews-game-of-thrones">Warming Glow</a> – <em>Game of Thrones</em> may have failed to best <em>Boardwalk Empire</em>, but it did handily beat-out the <em>Treme</em> premiere&#8217;s ratings, and <em>Treme</em> was also renewed by HBO right off the bat.</p>
<p>The fact that <em>Game of Thrones</em> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2011/apr/19/game-of-thrones-lucy-mangan">set a ratings record for its British network</a> Sky Atlantic is a very positive sign for HBO. Serialized cable television series generate a good proportion of their revenue off the sale of DVD/Blu-Ray box-sets, and with a strong international audience – <em>Game of Thrones</em> could be a huge success in that format.</p>
<p>On some level, HBO is likely disappointed that <em>Game of Thrones</em> failed to crack the 3 million viewers mark for the premiere – however, the underlying ratings numbers still look promising, and there is significant room for growth. Positive reviews, word of mouth and a hearty serving of smut and blood helped <em>True Blood</em> woo mainstream viewers – and the challenge for <em>Game of Thrones</em>, now, is to do the same.</p>
<p>Can the show have appeal beyond fans of the books, fans of fantasy and women who like men with swords? We still can&#8217;t answer that question, and time will tell, but we certainly hope so. In the meantime, we&#8217;re just looking forward to at least 19 more episodes of Emilia Clarke nude, Sean Bean&#8217;s classic &#8220;gravely agonizing over matters of honour&#8221; face and more sloppy sound-effects to accompany various types of dismemberment!</p>
<p><strong><em>Game of Thrones</em> continues Sunday nights at 9 PM on HBO and HBO Canada.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/19/hbo-renews-game-of-thrones-for-second-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game of Thrones Interview: Kit Harington</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/08/game-of-thrones-interview-kit-harington/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/08/game-of-thrones-interview-kit-harington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 04:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Perkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit Harington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Addy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Dinklage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samwell Tarly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Night's Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we were lucky enough to speak with actor Kit Harington, who plays Jon Snow in HBO's epic fantasy series <em>Game of Thrones</em>. We discussed the audition process for the show, his character Jon Snow, the sprawling and illustrious cast, <em>Thrones</em> fan sites, and what he keeps on his dork shelf. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/08/game-of-thrones-interview-kit-harington/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/GameofThrones-Kit-Harington.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12266" title="Game of Thrones - John Bradley &amp; Kit Harington" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/GameofThrones-Kit-Harington.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - John Bradley &amp; Kit Harington" width="600" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>With the premiere of HBO&#8217;s epic fantasy series <em>Game of Thrones</em> less than two weeks away, the hype surrounding the show contiunues to increase. The sprawling TV adaptation, based on author George R. R. Martin&#8217;s revered <em>A Song of Ice and Fire</em> novels, is already winning rave reviews from critics and fans alike. The Shelf had the opportunity to see the first two episodes of the show earlier this week and <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/">came away very impressed</a>.</p>
<p>Today we were lucky enough to speak with actor Kit Harington (in Toronto filming <em>Silent Hill: Revelation</em>), who plays Jon Snow in <em>Game of Thrones</em>. As the bastard son of Lord Eddard Stark (Sean Bean), Snow is the black sheep of his family. In an effort to find his place in the world, Jon joins the Night&#8217;s Watch; a once proud order of warriors dedicated to defending the northern reaches of the kingdom from an unknown threat. We discussed the audition process, the character of Jon Snow, the sprawling and illustrious cast, <em>Thrones</em> fan sites, and what he keeps on his dork shelf.</p>
<p><strong>Viewer beware: there is a potential spoiler at 11:10 in the interview.</strong></p>
<p><center><object width="600" height="368"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/up71npdwc-Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/up71npdwc-Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="600" height="368"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Special thanks to all the folks who submitted questions for Kit via email! Sorry that we couldn&#8217;t get to them all.</p>
<p><strong><em>Game of Thrones</em> begins April 17 at 9 PM on HBO Canada and HBO.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/08/game-of-thrones-interview-kit-harington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who Season 6 Trailer</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/07/doctor-who-season-6-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/07/doctor-who-season-6-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shelagh Rowan-Legg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Gillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[season 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Moffat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new season of <cite>Doctor Who</cite> begins in a little over two weeks on April 23. I don't think I've quivered with this much anticipation since the new series began five or so years ago. I went into the last season with mixed feelings. I had full confidence in new head writer Stephen Moffat, but was worried about the loss of David Tennant. All I can say now is, David who (yes, pun intended)?  <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/07/doctor-who-season-6-trailer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/Doctor-Who-Series-6.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12256" title="Doctor Who Series 6" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/04/Doctor-Who-Series-6.jpg" alt="Doctor Who Series 6" width="600" height="330" /></a></p>
<p>The new season of <cite>Doctor Who</cite> begins in a little over two weeks on April 23. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve quivered with this much anticipation since the new series began five or so years ago. I went into the last season with mixed feelings. I had full confidence in new head writer Stephen Moffat, but was worried about the loss of David Tennant. All I can say now is, David who (yes, pun intended)? Matt Smith brings a wry humour, energy and more delicious darkness to the Doctor, and he is more than matched by Karen Gillan as his sexy and intrepid companion Amy/Amelia. They are now by far the best pairing. And while I sometimes miss just having the two of them share the screen, the additions of extra companions Rory and River Song work very nicely. The trailer offers a few clues to upcoming episodes.</p>
<p><center><object width="600" height="368"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9vIsQ25Krq8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9vIsQ25Krq8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="600" height="368"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><cite>Doctor Who</cite> Season (Series) 6 begins April 23 on SPACE, BBC and BBC America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/07/doctor-who-season-6-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game of Thrones Impressions</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Drance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D. B. Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Benioff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George R. R. Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit Harington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Headey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandwiches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Van Patten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, we were treated to the first two episodes of HBO's highly anticipated, big-budget fantasy serial <cite>Game of Thrones</cite>, based on R.R. Martin's fantasy series of the same name. Though we left the screening rather impressed, we wonder whether the series will have the cross-over appeal required to sustain itself at its current budget. <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/Game-of-Thrones-Danerys.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11743" title="Game of Thrones - Daenerys - Emilia Clarke" src="http://dorkshelf.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/Game-of-Thrones-Danerys.jpg" alt="Game of Thrones - Daenerys - Emilia Clarke" width="600" height="339" /></a></p>
<p>On Monday, we were treated to the first two episodes of HBO&#8217;s highly anticipated, big-budget fantasy serial <em>Game of Thrones</em>, based on R.R. Martin&#8217;s fantasy series of the same name. Though we left the screening rather impressed, we wonder whether the series will have the cross-over appeal required to sustain itself at its current budget &#8211; roughly estimated at <a href="http://www.westeros.org/GoT/Features/Entry/3988/">4.5 million per episode</a>.</p>
<p>Despite our concerns, <em>Game of Thrones</em> has a lot going for it. The pilot and the second episode are filled with bloody middle-ages style violence, and feature a number of gorgeous actresses in the buff. The heady cocktail of beheadings, blood, the supernatural, perversion and sex that pervade the first two episodes of the series, hints at <em>Thrones</em>&#8216; potential to be a better version of <em>True Blood</em> – only catered towards nerds and straight guys. HBO released the first 15 minutes of the series as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQykXOukM2Q">an exclusive sneak-peak</a> on Sunday evening and it <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/04/05/game-of-thrones-ratings-heres-how-many-watched-hbos-preview/">attracted 720,000 viewers</a>. Though the balance of the first two episodes fails to maintain the “beheadings per minute” ratio of the sneak-peak, it&#8217;s a good indicator of the level and quality of the violence in the first couple of episodes.</p>
<p>The pilot centers around Lord Eddard “Ned” Stark – portrayed by a characteristically grim Sean Bean – and his family. The Starks are a noble house, and they occupy Winterfell, a remote outpost in the North. But there is trouble afoot in the kingdom, and Ned is asked by the King to take up the dangerous, and powerful position of &#8216;Hand of the King&#8217; in the capital of King&#8217;s Landing. Sean Bean grapples with the decision of whether or not to accept, and luckily for the audience, he&#8217;s a master at making decisions seem particularly grave and significant. Frankly, I would happily watch Sean Bean fret about his order at Subway for an hour (Turkey&#8230; Or Tuna? &lt;grimaces&gt;) – thankfully in <em>Game of Thrones </em>he&#8217;s given significantly more intriguing circumstances to grapple with.</p>
<p>The sound effects were of particular interest to me, the presence of gusting winds in the North being a dominant feature of the first episodes. The wind is omnipresent in the North, almost its own character, and its used effectively – infusing the action with a sense of wildness, suspense and vulnerability. The visual effects, costumes and settings are inspired; the acting is stellar; and the plot, though satisfyingly complex, manages to avoid being too complicated for the uninitiated to follow.</p>
<p>HBO mainstay Tim Van Patten – a veteran of <em>The Wire</em>, <em>The Pacific</em>, <em>Deadwood</em>, <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> and <em>The Sopranos</em> – directs the first two episodes with his usual steady-hand. His accomplishment is commendable, he ably manages to introduce the viewer to a diverse set of characters, and the unfamiliar world they occupy, while maintaining a watchable, entertaining pace. It must have been a tough balancing act – but it&#8217;s pulled off with aplomb.</p>
<p>Regardless of the ultimate success or failure of the show – we applaud HBO for committing their talent, experience and money to an ambitious experiment within the fantasy genre. We enjoyed their previous foray into medieval/classical period pieces with <em>Rome</em> – but, it&#8217;s safe to say – we&#8217;ve never seen anything like <em>Game of Thrones</em> on cable before. Will that be enough to sustain the series? We&#8217;re not going to bet our dire-wolf on it, but our fingers are crossed.</p>
<p><strong><em>Game of Thrones</em> begins airing April 17th at 9 PM on HBO and HBO Canada.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/06/game-of-thrones-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wondercon: New Thundercats Footage</title>
		<link>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/03/wondercon-this-time-thundercats-footage/</link>
		<comments>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/03/wondercon-this-time-thundercats-footage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 01:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Demers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thundercats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wondercon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkshelf.com/?p=12222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More new footage arrived from the Wondercon convention this past weekend; while we let you guys know about the <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/02/behold-wondercon-green-lantern-footage/">extended <em>Green Lantern</em> trailer yesterday</a>, today we come back with some new <em>Thundercats</em> footage! <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/03/wondercon-this-time-thundercats-footage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/03/wondercon-this-time-thundercats-footage/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>More new footage arrived from the Wondercon convention this past weekend; while we let you guys know about the <a href="http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/02/behold-wondercon-green-lantern-footage/">extended <em>Green Lantern</em> trailer yesterday</a>, today we come back with some new <em>Thundercats</em> footage!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little young for <em>Thundercats</em>, so I&#8217;m going to leave the nostalgia-ing to those who&#8217;ve had a little more experience; maybe it&#8217;s time that I go back and relive one of the 80s&#8217; much-vaunted series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dorkshelf.com/2011/04/03/wondercon-this-time-thundercats-footage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

